Thursday, August 27, 2015

Unsanity, the malady of the millennium is spreading and you and I are victims

Below is my column as delivered to the editors of the Sturbridge Times Magazine for the April, 2015 issue

Call me crazy, or something

by Richard Morchoe

There is a vast population of high functioning people who harbor ideas that seem valid, but are delusional. They are everywhere, including the highest levels of government and business. This class are our friends and relatives, and sadly, you and I need only look in the mirror to meet them.
The folks under discussion are not people who need to be cared for. Most can rise in the morning, competently dress and go to a business or place of employment and spend the day doing useful work. Many attain success in their chosen field.
What is the horrible malady victimizing our population? It is not insanity. The afflicted need not be restrained from doing harm to themselves or others. At large, they are not a threat to public order. Indeed there is no description of the condition in the DSM-5(Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, it is used to diagnose and classify mental disorders).
As pervasive as it is, there is almost no discussion of it anywhere. The only thing to be done was to engage the resources of our official think tank, The Long Hill Institute for the Study of Heretofore Unrecognized Psychological Conditions (LHIftSoHUPC for short).
A wonderful aspect of the LHIftSoHUPC is that the shoot from the hip methodology means there are never interminable hours of research. A name for the condition and a definition of terms were arrived at almost instantaneously.
Thus we have Unsanity, that is, a condition where an individual believes feelings are thoughts, facts or arguments.
Your columnist is himself a victim. I firmly hold that ingesting huge quantities of Stonyfield Creme Caramel Ice Cream is healthy because it's organic. Even worse, I trust and act on the advertisement that says “Guinness is good for you” because they wouldn't let them say that if it weren't true.
The cognitive aberrations of a scribbler at a regional magazine are of no import in the great world. However, when people of position pontificate wildly, it should give us pause.
Marie Harf is deputy spokesperson at State. In that position she has the unenviable job of defending administration foreign policy. In a well-reported exchange with Chris Matthews, Ms. Harf suggested; “we cannot win this war by killing them. We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium to longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups, whether it’s lack of opportunity for jobs.”
So that's all it takes to win the War on Terror, a jobs program. Forget that the guy known as Jihadi John, who beheads the hostages, is a highly employable tech grad. Also put aside when suicide bombers blow themselves up they are yelling “Allahu Akbar” and not “if only I had a job at Goldman Sachs or flipping burgers or working as a spokesflack at Foggy Bottom.”
Marie, and one might guess a lot of Americans, might find it hard to grasp that not everyone in the world just wants wage slavery. They would be well advised to read George Orwell's review of Mein Kampf. Orwell, a man who was not unsane, noted that Hitler said, “"I offer you struggle, danger and death," and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet.” The lovely life of happy self-actualization the West offers is not a universal aspiration. There is no lack of people who find it empty.
Then again, The Allies were able to disabuse Germany of the notion by killing one heck of a lot of them over five years.


Ms. Harf accused her critics of not being able to understand “too nuanced an argument.” that would seem to be a new way of saying “I was taken out of context” except that she said it with not a little confidence. On Long Hill, we agree the war is not going to be won by killing, but neither is the universal jobs idea a winner. If after almost a decade and a half, all we seem to get is more war, maybe the game is not worth it. That's no more an unsane conclusion than any other.
Despite the fact that we have savaged conservatives such as Ann Coulter, Howie Carr and Mitt Romney in the pages of this magazine, there is the view extant that we are running a militia up on Long Hill. Thus, we feel it incumbent on us to search to starboard for unsanity. Fortunately, our country is a target rich environment across the board.
The Capo di Tutti Capi of conservative talk is a prime example of the phenomenon. Rush Limbaugh rose to prominence in the early 90s when shilling for Gulf War I. He has always been a self-proclaimed champion of liberty. His show is one long paean to freedom.
Until it is time to hide under the bed in fear. According to Mr. Freedom, in light of the Snowden revelations, “Our civil liberties are worthless if we are dead! If you are dead and pushing up daisies, if you're sucking dirt inside a casket, do you know what your civil liberties are worth? Zilch, zero, nada.”* True enough as nothing matters at that point other than how you lived your life. The LHIftSoHUPC can only render a diagnosis of Grand Mal Unsanity.
The LHIftSoHUPC can do little to help the high and mighty with the condition no matter how pervasive it is among the elite. We are here for the citizenry of our region even if the fee structure has not been set and we are a bit fuzzy on treatment. However, if a client is not satisfied, we offer a complimentary dish of ice cream or pint of stout. Your choice.
*From No Place to Hide, by Glenn Greenwald reviewed in the Jul,y 2014 Sturbridge Times Magazine.










Sunday, August 23, 2015

Education may not be what it used to be, but whatever it is, it's got to change-Kevin Carey's points in the right direction

The End of College: Creating the Future of Learning and the University of Everywhere
By Kevin Carey
Riverhead Books, 2015
Hardcover, 288 pages
ISBN-10: 1594632057
ISBN-13: 978-1594632051
List: $27.95 Amazon: $19.45

Originally published in the Sturbridge Times Magazine.

Book review by Richard Morchoe

`EVERYBODY has won, and all must have prizes.'

So proclaimed the Dodo after the caucus race in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. That would seem to be the ethos behind our nation's attitude toward post-secondary schooling. There would be a place for everyone to attain an education and a ticket to a middle-class life.

On the surface, it would seem to be working. After The Second World War enrollment in colleges and universities continually increased such that today a third of the population have bachelor's degrees as opposed to ten percent in 1960. By 2005 a college grad made 80% more per hour than someone with a high school diploma, whereas in 1977 it was 40%.

Not all is sweetness and light. In The End of College, Kevin Carey puts contemporary higher education under the microscope and finds that we have not entered academic nirvana, but there is hope. It's just not in the current system.

According to Carey, “Americans have long been told that our colleges and universities are the best in the world. It turns out that when it comes to college student learning, we are decidedly mediocre.”

As evidence, he cites a 2013 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development study “that compared the literacy, numeracy, and problem solving skills of adults in different countries. Fully 38 percent of American college graduates failed to meet at least the third level on a five-level assessment of numeracy that involves solving problems with math and performing “basic analysis of data and statistics.” Only 19 percent met the forth level, compared to the average of 25 percent in other industrialized nations.”

Why is this so? According to the author, schools demand little from their charges. In 1961 full time college students devoted 40 hours a week to class and study. In 2003, it was down to 27 hours with 20% reporting less than five hours outside of class. To the pupils credit, they have been able to get higher marks with less work. Grade inflation is such that the median at Harvard is A minus and what college does not follow Crimson's lead?

Despite high grades and light work, a lot of the kids still can't keep it together. Fewer than two thirds graduate in four years. They may not have a degree, but they can amass debt like the young man or woman who does finish. The average liability is $30,000. Added together, it has blown by credit card debt.

If you are searching for a word for this system, you could do worse than dysfunctional. Can it change? Carey is optimistic for many reasons including money.

On Page 130 Carey recounts his time at the office of Learn Capital. Charts were displayed in circles that gave the total markets of four sectors. They were Enterprise software, $0.3 trillion, eCommerce, $0.8 trillion, Media & Entertainment, $1.6 trillion. Last, in the largest circle is Education, $4.6 trillion. Ed is the only sector that has not gone digital. Who would not salivate at the size of that market.

So what form will the revolution take? According to the author, “The University of Everywhere” is already happening. The most common form is called a Massive Online Open Course or MOOC. There are famous ones such as Khan Academy and Coursera. Will they succeed? What is necessary is for employers to accept completion as a worthy credential?

As an entry into the MOOC world, MIT and Harvard have all their courses online for anyone to take. The author enrolled in Course 7.00x: Introduction to Biology-The Secret of Life, a mandatory course for all MIT freshman. It is taught by Eric Lander who helmed the Human Genome Project. Clearly, this was not going to be a gut course.

Mr. Carey did not get a diploma for his effort, but did receive verification that he had successfully completed the course at the most prestigious research university in the world. Not bad for a man who has a political science degree awarded in 1992.

Now will the world accept MOOC credentials? That is the big question.

The End of College included a wide ranging treatment of what education is. Interestingly, at least to this reviewer, Carey, discusses Cardinal Newman. The prelate's series of lectures on education were made into the book, The Idea of a University.

According to Carey, “True liberal education,” Newman believed, “was not a matter of merely accumulating knowledge in a specific subject. The most important goal was to understand how all the different aspects of the world are connected.”

At my Papist college, The Idea of a University was required reading the summer before freshman year. I got little out of it other than the knowledge that I did not belong anywhere near a serious educational institution. My focus, when actually making some effort, was on my major. My guess is that for most of my contemporaries it was narrower. A good career was the goal.

In truth, if every college and university disappeared from the developed world, that would not stop someone from getting an education. As long as libraries were still extant, and the resources on the internet had not evaporated, the intelligent and serious scholars would be able to educate themselves. The most important quality necessary would be the burning desire.

We should be honest and admit that thirst for an education, in the sense Newman meant it, rarely exists. Even so, most people desire some learning either out of a genuine curiosity or for career entry and advancement. It is difficult to say if Carey's University of Everywhere is inevitable. Its desirability is not arguable.