Sunday, October 27, 2019

Review of How to Change Your Mind: What the New Science of Psychedelics Teaches Us About Consciousness, Dying, Addiction, Depression and Transcendence By Michael Pollan


Below is my review of Michael Pollan's book as submitted to the editor for the April, 2019 issue of The Sturbridge Times Town & Country Living Magazine.

Mind Blowing

How to Change Your Mind: What the New Science of Psychedelics Teaches Us About Consciousness, Dying, Addiction, Depression and Transcendence
By Michael Pollan
Penguin Press, 2018
Hardcover, 480 Pages

By Richard Morchoe


How to Change Your Mind: What the New Science of Psychedelics Teaches Us About Consciousness, Dying, Addiction, Depression, and Transcendence by Michael Pollan was not what someone of my generation might have expected.  Baby boomers would remember the subject by conjuring up pictures in their minds of news reports from Woodstock and people in tie dyed tee shirts as well as friends telling of their “Trips.”  That is, of course, if they were not doing it themselves.

As the 60s became the 70s, the LSD culture that had been part of hippiedom seemed to wane.  True, there may have been a persistence invisible to the general society, but few would have known.

Is Mr. Pollan writing about a resurgence of the counterculture?  Not at all.  Has he taken notice of the “Microdosing” of psychedelics that is the rage in Silicon Valley among techies?  Yes, but only in passing.

How to Change Your Mind is a history of all that has happened in the development of substances that do change the mind, but it is much more than that.  It is also an exploration of what the drugs can and are doing and it is personal.

The author and I are baby boomers with him being five years my junior.  This leads me to wonder about his motivation.  When the “Summer of Love” happened in 1967, he can’t have known anyone who had “dropped acid” at the time.  Scott MacKenzie’s lyrics beginning with “If you’re going to San Francisco” would have had little meaning to him as he would not have known someone wearing “flowers in their hair.”

Then again, in his youth, the man was braver than I.  No matter who was doing what around me, your reviewer never touched the stuff while Pollan ate magic mushrooms with his future wife.

If you were looking for someone to tell us where the world now stands with mind altering substances and how we got here, you could do worse than Michael Pollan.

Pollan is the author of several books, probably best known for the Omnivore’s Dilemma, an engaging discussion of where our food comes from and how it affects us.  The book was controversial as he is not for many of the practices of industrial agriculture.

Pollan’s attitude toward food is popular enough with many and thus is hardly out of the mainstream.  At this point in time, psychedelics are nowhere near that, yet the subject matter is not really a departure for someone with as inquisitive a mind.  Who knows, it may have been unanswered questions from his experiments with his partner that spurred his interest, or not.

Albert Hofmann did not invent psychedelics, indigenous people of the Americas had been doing mushrooms for centuries.  He did discover what we know as LSD.  Hofmann himself may not have set out to get high, but he did.

The Swiss research chemist partook of the molecule in 1943.  His experience, not completely pleasant, convinced him that the substance would be of no little value to psychiatry.  Hofmann, according to Pollan, did not foresee that it would also become a “pleasure drug.”  Yet he understood it as a response to a spiritually impoverished society needing a “spiritual balm.” He was not a soulless scientist.

LSD would be studied seriously in the academic and medical world along with mushrooms and derivatives.   The famous novelist, Aldous Huxley would write of his 1953 experience with Mescaline in his book The Doors of Perception.

Interestingly, Bill Wilson, also known as Bill W, founder of Alcoholics Anonymous was interested in psychedelics as possibly part of the program due to its spiritual aspects.

Of course, Timothy Leary was inevitable and LSD, Mescaline, Psilocybin et al went out into the world.  The world got to see it all through the eyes of the media and pushback occurred such that the substances would become scheduled by the government.

The hibernation appears to be over and thus Mr. Pollan’s book.  He documents where the study and experimentation is now headed.  The author personally became part of his research.  He does also admit to some, not demons, but questions maybe and “there are moments when curiosity gets the better of fear.”

Participation would be necessary as all you have are the subjective experiences of study volunteers, as well documented as they may be.

Taking the substances without some guidance and in the wrong environment, what is referred to as “set and setting,” could be a problem.  A guide is necessary as the result could be a “bad trip” with the wrong person or none at all.  Pollan documented his search for a discerning chaperone.

The author would use LSD, Psilocybin, and 5-MeO-DMT (found on a psychoactive toad species and is obscure, a tribute to Pollan’s dedication and daring that he would do it).  The effects on him would vary and be a learning experience.

When he was taking LSD, he asked the woman guiding him if they could change the music that accompanied the session.  Music was part of each experience and had run to New Age and Pollan found it bland.  He and the guide agreed on a Bach unaccompanied cello suite.  Michael described it as mournful and it is somber. 

The author began his recounting of the “trip” by writing, “Never before has a piece of music pierced me as deeply as this one did now” and went on to wax eloquent on what it evoked.  One might wonder how valid it all was and they would not be alone.  In a later recollection, he would think, “Fool, you were on drugs.” 

Reflecting on it further led him to write “everything I experienced, I experienced…” and in a session with the guide, was able to realize what he could take from it.

After the voyages to inner space, How to Change Your Mind explores what psychedelics can do for the greater world in the chapter, “Trip Treatment.”  It begins with the story of the latter days of Patrick Mettes.  Patrick would participate in a trial with
psilocybin at N.Y.U.  As Pollan puts it, it “would change his death.”

Mettes had a virulent cancer and, according to Michael, “was buckling under the weight” of the chemo and “the dawning realization that he might not survive.”  Patrick’s end of life journey is lovely to read.

The rest of Trip Treatment speaks to research in addiction and depression and though there is promise, that is all there is at this point and much is to be done.  

So, should we all be thinking about the possibility of seeking a change of mind?  The last chapter has a debate about the purpose of it all.  We might applaud uses that lead to amelioration of suffering, but is that it?  Is the promise that all the researchers after Hofmann saw not to be realized?  Will we not see psychedelics be used, in the words of Bob Jesse, for “the betterment of well people?”

The whole experience did change Pollan’s mind.  He ends with, “Mysteries abide.  But this I can say with certainty: the mind is vaster, and the world ever so much more alive, than I knew when I began.”





Tuesday, October 8, 2019

Review of Alex Berenson's Tell Your Children: The Truth About Marijuana, Mental Illness, and Violence


Below is my review of Tell Your Children as submitted to the editor of the Sturbridge Times Town & Country Living Magazine.

The review appeared in the May 2019 issue

America Gone to Pot

Tell Your Children: The Truth About Marijuana, Mental Illness, and Violence
By Alex Berenson
Free Press, 2019
Hardcover, 272 Pages
ISBN-10: 1982103663
ISBN-13: 978-1982103668
  
By Richard Morchoe

There is a sense of déjà vu in reading Tell Your Children: The Truth About Marijuana, Mental Illness, and Violence.

Except there isn't.  Déjà vu is the illusion or feeling something has already been experienced.  This is not an illusion.  We are over and over again looking at the question of legalized and medicalized marijuana.

You may ask, hadn't the question gone away?  That was devoutly to be wished and if democracy changed anything, it should have by the miracle of a referendum.  Citizens of the region can head up the street to Leicester and purchase what they feel will make them happy and that was to be an end on to it.

Along comes Alex Berenson, author of Tell Your Children to inform us we have to go back to thinking about what we had wanted to forget.

At the beginning of his book, Mr. Berenson lets us know he was also surprised to be back discussing the subject like the rest of us.  After all, proponents of legalization have had it all their way, or so it seemed.  Studies said cannabis was safe, if not healthy.

Berenson had accepted it.  Heck, he'd toked in Amsterdam.  His mind might never have changed if he were not married to a forensic psychiatrist.

Alex and wife were talking about a case, "the usual horror story, somebody who'd cut up his grandmother" or something.  His wife, who deals with such stuff said, "Of course he was high, been smoking pot his whole life."

Alex replied, "Of course?"  His wife rejoined with, "Yeah, they all smoke."

All the propaganda of the last several years has been pro-cannabis.  The author was incredulous and his wife suggested he read the studies.

Alex Berenson had been a reporter for the New York Times, and had covered the Iraq war, Hurricane Katrina and the drug industry.  He had been away from that for several years having taken up the novel with success.

What his wife had started with the challenge would lead to Tell Your Children.  

Berenson read the studies and statistics and did leg work as well.  He put them together in Tell Your Children, and there is a lot.  Yet, one might accuse him of having a plot, as there is much anecdotal material in the book.  It is necessary from the standpoint that when a horrendous incident occurs, it is not often, if at all, connected to "weed."

One anecdote that is never cited by proponents is the story of Tom Forcade.  Forcade, a pseudonym, was the founder of High Times Magazine.  His journal pushed the liberalization of attitudes to drugs as Playboy did about sex.  Forcade was wildly successful.

Tom may have wanted the country to "mellow out," but he didn't.  

Forcade was transiting to paranoiaville.  Berenson quotes a long diatribe from a 1978 interview about how beleaguered he felt due to the numerous imaginary government agents out to get him.  Forcade lashed out saying "Effectively, I spent the last ten years in jail…" 

Three weeks later, he blew his brains out.

Forcade's staff smoked his ashes at the top of the World Trade Center and went on with the mission without him.  Berenson, the reporter, wrote it without comment.  The lack of any self-awareness from Forcade or his minions said it all.

The other anecdotes are as horrible, but are of tragedies that don't just self-victimize one person. Instead families and relationships can be brutally destroyed and multiple, mostly innocent, lives ended.

One can get into a statistics war where no one escapes the fog, but what seemed most convincing was at the beginning when his wife and he were making conversation.  Evidence unbidden lends weight.

Some statistics argue more convincingly even if not part of research.  When a law changes and rates increase, or decrease sharply over a short span of years, that says more than any study no matter how well planned and executed.  True, the interpretation can be subject to reporting biases, but the stats are there for all sides to chew over.

Your reviewer is not a man for numbers and charts, though he can read the odd table.  Ever cognizant of Mark Twain's dictum, "There are lies, damn lies, and statistics" I realized help would be needed for a more nuanced understanding.

I searched for some opposition to his outlook and it exists.  

Not unexpectedly, Rolling Stone weighed in.  The headline, "Is Alex Berenson Trolling Us With His Anti-Weed Book?" lacked for subtlety.  Had one not paid attention the subtitle, "A former ‘New York Times’ journalist wrote about a “hidden epidemic” cause(sic) by pot — but it seems he got the science wrong" would make sure the message got through.  The article, by Amanda Chicago Lewis, an investigative reporter covering cannabis, could be described as tendentious.

Searching for a more reasonable contrast to the author, I found it on a two and three quarter hour video of Berenson and two men not opposed to using pot at least in some circumstances.  The host, Joe Rogan, admits to being a user and the other guest, Dr. Michael Hart uses it in his practice.

Though there was much talking over each other, and both the host and the doctor made some good points for limited clinical use, Berenson held his own.  Other than on the edges of the discussion, he was far more right than wrong.  Tell Your Children stood up well.

Even though the question of the legal status of marijuana has been debated since the 60s, Alex Berenson has made the case convincingly that, at the least, the conversation has been way too short and the rush to legalize too quick.

What now?  Berenson has no illusions as to where our society stands at this point in time.  He is not for restarting the drug war, but sees decriminalization as reasonable.

Legalization, however, has many bad results not the least for young people.  Per Alex, "Most of all, legalization signals that marijuana is not dangerous and encourages teen use.  The states with the highest rates of youth marijuana use all allow legalized recreational sales or medical sales with very loose conditions."

Berenson has asserted much in his book, but he has backed it up well.  If there were two points your reviewer might want to emphasize, the first would be, Marijuana is not medicine.  The second, marijuana is associated with violence.

People like George Soros, a big funder mentioned in the book and busy bodies like Rick Steeves who contributed to our repeal campaign, should give some thought for what their responsibility is.  Senators Schumer and Booker, who are pushing legalization nationally might as well.  As Mark Anthony said, "The evil that men do lives long after them."

As a postscript, the reviewer has two friends he has known for decades.  They are cannabis users of long standing, and have never been involved in a hint of violence.  That, however, does not invalidate Berenson's work.